I don't have a category for criminal activity. That is because we don't generally see criminal activity in local government.
(insert laughter here)
No, I'm serious. I think that most problems in government come from incompetence, or ignorance. Not intent to do wrong.
I also don't consider myself to be someone who accuses others. We're all passengers on this ship, and as such should consider it our responsibility to point out the iceberg when we see one.
So, I'm relieved to hear that the legislature wants to work with school boards to audit school districts accounting, and budgeting, practices. Not because they will find more fraud, but that they will find more waste.
Legislators may home in on Davis funds scandal
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste at 11/29/2006 09:34:00 AM
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste] Legislature to audit schools
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
11:58 AM
0
comments
Labels: fraud, legislature, spending, waste
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions] Mountain Peaks of debate
Some sounds can still be heard with earmuffs.
When code-words are ignored by either party, which is rare since it is so deeply ingrained in our psyche, then the code can be escalated to another level.
A label.
Labels can define who the offender is without the inconvenience of a presumption of innocence. There is no longer a need to listen once a label has been successfully applied.
These key words start having their effect on us when we are very young, but they don't take full hold until we gain some experience in dealing with them.
Our programming can be reversed, but not without some conscious effort on our part. It takes two things.
Air, and exposure to ordinarily offensive materials (Not pornographic, but something that elicits a bolded response in our minds).
Listen to someone with whom you might presumably disagree, and then instead of cutting them off with a code-word, breath deep.
Take another breath.
Now for an example that could try even the most practiced of this art. The issue is now moot, which is a fantastic reason to entertain another perspective.
Moot arguments carry no inherent risk to the status quo.
In 1895, Utah was being considered for statehood, and delegations gathered to decide upon the drafting of a state constitution. One, unexpected, wedge issue was suffrage for women.
B.H. Roberts had been sent with another to represent Davis County.
When word got back to his party that he had taken the lead in opposing suffrage then the following was sent.
"DEAR SIR:_Our attention has been called to the position you are taking in the Convention, regarding woman suffrage, and we are informed, in fact the Herald says as much, that you are looked upon as a leader of the opposition on the floor of the Convention. This position is not in line with the sentiments of your constituents, and further, in the county convention that nominated you, a resolution was presented and adopted, favoring equal suffrage, and requesting our delegates to work for it. Our campaign, locally and territorially, was conducted with this as an important plank in the platform.In view of these facts, and the further fact that Davis County is so overwhelmingly in favor of an equal suffrage provision in the Constitution, we feel it our duty to ask you to not oppose this suffrage plank. If your convictions will not permit you to vote in favor of it, you might at least, remain inactive in the matter, and thus save our party the humiliation of having their pledges broken."Roberts was asked to resign if he could not restrain himself. His Co-delegate chose to read the above letter to the entire body. (A little aside: the letter was signed by a man that, later, had Roberts speak at his funeral.)
Now what is interesting about the proceedings is that Roberts was given some time to speak, and after his time was cut short, he negotiated with the body to be allowed the final word.
The delegates opposed to Roberts spoke for an additional two days. On the third day, Roberts was finally given the opportunity to close the debate, knowing full well, that he would be buried under the votes against him for suffrage.
I find Roberts closing remarks to show tremendous courage and his arguments to be logical. I find I can't help but agree with him on some of his points, and yet the argument is moot.
It's clear that Roberts knew what could be done to him by invoking just a few code-words.
"I know, sir, for announcing this doctrine in such cool terms that I shall be anathematized perchance as a tyrant to women, a man unfeeling and tyrannical in his disposition towards the fair sex, but I shall trust to those who know me and my life not to take any serious consideration of that accusation, and I shall try to convince this Convention by an expression of my views on that subject, that I do not believe that leadership, headship, responsibility of precedency, is necessarily accompanied by tyranny and by oppression."The main part of Roberts remarks took place on April 2, 1895.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions at 11/28/2006 11:31:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
6:16 PM
0
comments
Labels: creative solutions, weasel words
[Davis County Watch: Citizenship] Standard Examiner:Davis boundaries, reloaded
The Standard Examiner hopes that the School Board will truly display some transparency in its boundary decisions.
"For that reason, we hope the Bountiful parents who filed suit over the closed meetings do not yet drop their legal action. Obtaining a judge's ruling in favor of the open-meetings requirement will force Davis education officials to debate this and future boundary adjustments in the open."In other words, don't stop punching until the board says 'Uncle!'
Davis boundaries, reloaded
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Citizenship at 11/27/2006 10:19:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
12:07 AM
0
comments
Labels: citizenship, education
Monday, November 27, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste] Utah Planner's Corner: What a View... for Me!
Wilf Sommerkorn has a thoughtful piece on the NSL/SL land dispute. He's attempting to be balanced on the issue, and so doesn't let loose with any sort of conclusion. I have to concur with his feelings about the place, though.
"No question, this is a great area. The views are fantastic! Given the rapid pace of development in Davis County and all along the Wasatch Front, it is nice to have some areas that stay undeveloped. But...but, to some degree, it does strike me as more of the Gangplank syndrome (you know, "I'm aboard, now hoist up the gangplank and don't let anyone else on board!")"I must say that NSL wants to preserve the land and they have a plan to do so. Starting by building some trailhead. If the land isn't going to be trampled by naturists, then we should lay some groundwork for them.
What a View...For Me!
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste at 11/27/2006 09:06:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
10:53 PM
0
comments
[Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions] Word of the Day: Logomachy
Main Entry: lo·gom·a·chy
Pronunciation: lO-'gä-m&-kE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -chies
Etymology: Greek logomachia, from log- + machesthai to fight
1 : a dispute over or about words
2 : a controversy marked by verbiage
This is the type of argument I wish to avoid for a number of reasons.
First, I like to play with words a little, and if I have to be overly concerned that my words will be misinterpreted, then some of my joy leaves me.
Second, I'm more than happy to interpret meaning based upon contextual clues, and purists who insist that a word must mean a certain thing, only complicate the argument for me.
Third, I like to discuss the issues, and words are merely a vehicle to carry the debate forward.
So, if I say I meant something a certain way, don't get too hung up in what you thought I meant.
This blog is not a battle-ground for logomachies.
Now, I never thought I'd ever say that!
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions at 11/27/2006 04:05:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
5:18 PM
0
comments
Labels: blog, creative solutions
[Davis County Watch: Guest Bloggers] Why I yelled at Tyler yesterday
by Natalie
Let's say there is an honest, hardworking family, living below the poverty limit, because the head-of-household works somewhere that refuses to pay a living wage. Unbeknownst to this family, someone has accessed their bank accounts and is taking $25 a week from them.
When it is discovered, some people get angry that this poor family has not been receiving enough, and has then had money stolen from them. They believe that we should continue to fight for a living wage, so hardworking families can achieve their full potential. Others believe that this money being stolen from this family just goes to show how they really were receiving enough, and now, with that extra $25 a week,they should be able to do a lot more - maybe they're actually receiving too much? If they survived without that $25 a week, maybe they don't need it.
The situation regarding the embezzlement from the Davis School District is much like the analogy above. It depends on your perspective. I think Tyler's perspective is wrong.
Many of us believe that our system of public education in Utah is being slowly starved to death. The powers-that-be believe that our teachers are worth less than teachers in neighboring states, and should teach here without leaving or complaining, because they love to teach. And that we should have only the highest qualified people teaching, when the wages in Utah are so low, comparably. They believe that sharing textbooks and not being able to bring them home to do homework is acceptable, and that children can learn to read in a class with 28 other children, or can learn trigonometry in a class with 44 other students.
This is why I took offense at Tyler's comments - the question isn't that we can do more with less - we already know we can. Our luck is running out. We shouldn't have to do more with less. Those are OUR CHILDREN in those classrooms. And the accused embezzling is bad, and it makes me angry. But the attempt to starve my children's school in the name of unfunded federal and state mandates, getting even with the teacher's union, competition, so-called parent choice, or even asking the school district to do more with less is wrong. Should the district be responsible and accountable for the money it is given? Yes. Is the district given enough? No.
The days where Utah could have a great education system, regardless of the amount spent per-pupil, because of dedicated teachers and involved parents are coming to an end. There is a crisis on the horizon. It cannot be solved only with money, but money is definitely part of the solution. To imply that it is not is naive. And offensive.
--
Posted by NatGo to Davis County Watch: Guest Bloggers at 11/27/2006 08:20:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
9:30 AM
0
comments
Labels: guest bloggers
Saturday, November 25, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Citizenship] Thanksgiving: A week in review
We've had quite a bit going on this week, so I'd like to take a moment and review what has past.
Davis Lawsuit
The Davis County School District floated the idea earlier this week that the continuing lawsuit could lead to even less transparency than before.
Of course, it did.
By paying a consultant to evaluate the situation, it's anyones guess what this single individual will decide. When is the District going to involve parents?
I'm worried this lawsuit won't go away.
Charter Schools -Yea, or Nay
The Deseret News has suggested that lawmakers show restraint in the creation of new Charter Schools. A 200 page report put out by the Utah Education Policy Center suggests that this is the consensus of most parents.
Land Dispute
SL County has backed SL City in the ongoing lawsuit with North Salt Lake.
No Surprise.
Fraud in Davis County-Not a good month for the School District
Two former Davis County Employees (actually, there is another minor player) are indicted for allegedly defrauding the School District out of $4 Million dollars in five years. They likely have been doing this for 21 years, but won't be prosecuted for it. Who knows how much has been stolen in two decades?
A poorly worded post of mine prompted the suggestion that I would support continued felonious activities to be enacted upon the school district, and that I am a public school critic. This may suggest that I am anti-public school.
I, merely, intended to point out that the School District were given shoddy books at grossly inflated prices, not that we should continue to purchase "crummy" books and have someone pocket the money. I would recommend that the District take special care to implement better auditing and that it should be possible to spend much less and get much more.
As to the label, 'public school critic'. I prefer to be called a school critic. If my not being anti-private school equates me with being anti-public school, then I could be labeled as such. However, I think you can appreciate the benefits of both systems.
I do.
Is it too soon for a blogger, such as myself, to talk about reforms that could be enacted to prevent future criminal acts?
Frankly, no, but am I capitalizing on this news to make my point?
Yes. When I make 4 million dollars from 'proving my points', then talk to me about my ethics. I intend to continue drawing lessons out of situations that I encounter--good and bad.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Citizenship at 11/25/2006 10:07:00 PM
Friday, November 24, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste] Lessons learned from 4 Million stolen
The embezzlement of 4 Million dollars from Davis County School District can teach us a valuable lesson. When the feelings of betrayal have past, and the District is forced to contend with its books for next year, then we may learn that we can do more with less.
Yes, you read that correctly. The Rosses allegedly kept up this fraud for Twenty-one years! And, what were they doing in that time? They were trumpeting to the District the need for more money to supply the schools with what they needed. They were, in essence, inflating the existing budget to pay for their own exorbitant lifestyle.
True, the Rosses cut many more corners than is prudent for thieves. For example, they dealt out xerox copies of many textbooks. The materials were described as "crummy" by Superintendent Bowles. Yet, the fact that must not be overlooked when we address the new problem of replacing all these books is that the budget must be revised to meet the realistic needs of the District. For, many of the books, under the Rosses stewardship, were sold to the District for as much as seven times the amount charged by the publishers!
The Rosses are, of course, saying that they are innocent. They may be innocent, but if they are, they were incompetent fools with the Districts money.
When criminals, or alleged criminals, get to be in charge of budgets, then budgets grow. Now that these budgets will be returned to responsible hands, those in charge must remember in what ways they were duped. It wasn't just with "crummy" materials, but it was also in high prices.
Couple accused of $4M school scam
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste at 11/24/2006 11:22:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
12:22 PM
0
comments
[Davis County Watch: Announcements] Salt Lake County ‘betrays’ NSL in open space vote
Salt Lake County has voted to side with its own. If the disputed 80 acres gets disconnected from Salt Lake City, then North Salt Lake will still have to contend with Salt Lake County in order to use the land. North Salt Lake plans to fight for annexation from Salt Lake County if things progress that far.
This David now has to fight two Goliath's.
Salt Lake County ‘betrays’ NSL in open space vote
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Announcements at 11/24/2006 10:29:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
11:32 AM
0
comments
Labels: announcements, land
Tuesday, November 21, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Citizenship] SL County to vote on open space
SL County intends on backing SL Cities decision to zone NSL's 80 acres of land as open space. They make that stance official in a vote today.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Citizenship at 11/21/2006 09:40:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
6:15 PM
0
comments
Labels: citizenship, land
[Davis County Watch: Citizenship] The best policy: School boundary panel should operate in open
The Tribune editorial board has weighed in against the Davis County School District asking for more transparency. My favorite quote is this.
"The district counters that the 39 committee members included parents and that there had been ample opportunity for them to have their say."
My first chortle of the day.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
11:11 AM
0
comments
Labels: citizenship, education, quote of the day
[Davis County Watch: Citizenship] SL County to vote on open space
SL County intends on backing SL Cities decision to zone NSL's 80 acres of land as open space. They make that stance official in a vote today.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Citizenship at 11/21/2006 11:01:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
11:08 AM
0
comments
Labels: citizenship, land
Monday, November 20, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions] Solve Congestion first
The Utah Taxpayer Association has suggested that only "real congestion" should be addressed with dollars, not "pretend congestion". The question I have for those who advocate expanding the roads along Centerville is this. Is congestion a real problem along Main Street? It seems the influx of funds coming from the Legacy Highway fight has turned to a disadvantage for those who want thinking to be tied to spending.
The Utah Taxpayer Association blog elaborates further on this principle, as well as asserting more, in this post. It discusses the flawed thinking that has led the idea of extending TRAX to the airport.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions at 11/20/2006 08:17:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
9:27 PM
0
comments
Labels: creative solutions, taxes
[Davis County Watch: Taxes]This is NOT a hard pill to swallow...
My property taxes going down.
Vitamin firm expands in North Salt Lake
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Taxes at 11/20/2006 08:01:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
8:24 PM
0
comments
Labels: taxes
[Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste]Centerville Citizen: Mayor Russell response on Main Street
Centerville seems intent upon creating a faster way through town-as opposed to a faster way to town. The word, 'transportation', has become such a buzzword this election cycle that it has been assumed that any solution presented in which this word can be invoked, must be a good one.
Centerville Citizen has posted a letter from Mayor Russell in which it is urged that Centerville needs to develop its "heart". The way to this 'heart' is said to be an expansion of Main Street. Well, if Main Street is already at the center of town. If it is the heart, I would ask Mayor Russell where this new artery will lead, but out of the City.
The only way this could succeed is if Main Street were almost entirely zoned as commercial. There is a certain point at which residents want to drive slowly, and that point begins and ends at home.
This plan seems ill conceived. More still, it will lead to neighboring cities expanding adjoining streets to accommodate this action, carving it's swath throughout South Davis. Truly, this is a plan that favors commuters out of Davis County, not those who reside along the corridor.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste at 11/20/2006 07:11:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
7:26 PM
0
comments
Labels: transportation, waste
[Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste] Center offers report on charter schools
Utah Education Policy Center has released its findings on Charter Schools. The Legislature will have this 200 page report(pdf), as well as an audit performed by the Office of the Legislative Auditor General before it makes it's decision on what to do about Charter Schools.
Center offers report on charter schools
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste at 11/20/2006 05:31:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
6:43 PM
0
comments
Labels: charter schools, education
[Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste] Scrutinize charter schools
This post falls under the category of Waste, because we're not quite sure if Charter schools are wasteful. No criteria exist to measure their actual benefit. Charter Schools are still experimental
Here are the Charter Schools that exist in South Davis County. Two were added this year.
Utah Charter Schools
The measure put in place to protect our investment is to cap the creation of new Charter Schools. Five new schools per year for the State. The Deseret News Editorial board has urged lawmakers to continue to curb growth of these schools until we can measure their effectiveness.
That is good advice.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste at 11/20/2006 05:13:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
6:29 PM
2
comments
Labels: charter schools, education
[Davis County Watch: Citizenship] Davis School District takes off the gloves.
Davis School District officials now contend that a ruling against them in an up-coming lawsuit could lead to even less transparency. Let me say that again. School district officials are arguing that the District will have to become more secretive if they don't get their way.
Fear, uncertainty, doubt?
Other school districts in Utah, including Jordan, have almost every meeting open to the public.
It looks like the coalition of parents bringing this lawsuit deserve a win.
School official: Ruling against Davis' closed door may stifle; others say no
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Citizenship at 11/20/2006 04:48:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
5:58 PM
0
comments
Labels: education, lawsuit, transparency
[Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste] D.A.R.E.: On the Chopping Block
During the Republican Convention, Sheriff Bud Cox, pledged his support for the D.A.R.E. program. Meaning he intends to continue to use the Federal money he receives for it. Because, it turns out that this program depends upon the Byrne Grants. The Byrne grants are dollars given to local law enforcement to assist in fighting against drugs, and drug related crimes.
Up to now, funding for local drug education efforts have been given with no strings attached. Since 2004, however, the Whitehouse has made a continuous recommendation that the program either be cut, or that metrics be put in place to provide justification for the grants. The Whitehouse tried to cut them from the 2005 budget, but they were saved by the Legislature, funding them, at the previous years levels.
The Byrne Grants could be in jeopardy, again, unless local law enforcement can provide better metrics of their performance. Orrin Hatch, as recently as March 2004 has pledged his support for these grants but the Whitehouse has continued to identify these grants as 'Not performing'. To date no one has suggested how the success, or failure of these programs should be determined.
Accusations have been leveled at this Administration for overspending Federal dollars. Yet, we can't seem to stop begging for more from the same Government. How do we hold ourselves accountable for money we receive from the Federal Government? The answer is that we don't, unless it is required of us. If the Federal government does require that we report back on D.A.R.E, would Bud Cox think it is worth saving? Could we wean ourselves off of Federal handouts?
P.S. I had this post completely written when I came across this article echoing my sentiments. It gives, much better than I have here, some background on the Byrne grants, and reasons why they should only be given with the requirement of accountability. Now that the balance of power has shifted, so drastically, towards the Democrats, it is incumbent upon them to prove they can live without earmarks.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste at 11/20/2006 02:29:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
4:43 PM
0
comments
Friday, November 17, 2006
Up to $10,000 REWARD
UNITED STATES POSTAL INSPECTORS ARE OFFERING A REWARD OF UP TO $10,000 FOR INFORMATION LEADING TO THE ARREST AND CONVICTION OF THE PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING CORROSIVE CHEMICALS INTO THE COLLECTION BOXES AT THE NORTH SALT LAKE POST OFFICE, LOCATED AT 345 NORTH HWY 89, NSL, UT 84054, WHICH CAUSED THE DESTRUCTION OF UNITED STATES MAIL BETWEEN OCTOBER 27-28, 2006.--
IF YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION CONCERNING THIS INCIDENT, PLEASE CONTACT POSTAL INSPECTOR WAKEFIELD AT (801)887-1922 OR THE BOUNTIFUL POLICE DEPARTMENT (801)298-6000.
ALL INFORMATION RECEIVED WILL BE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.
DAVID WAKEFIELD
POSTAL INSPECTOR
DENVER DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY OFFICE
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Announcements at 11/17/2006 08:06:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
4:26 PM
0
comments
[Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste] Bountiful: City Council: Various and sundry items
Bountiful's City Council met on Tuesday to discuss the following.
- A crosswalk will be added at 200 East and 1200 North for better student access to Tolman Elementary.
- A recommendation to paint no parking zones on 500 West and 2700 South at Colonial Square.
- A skate park at Tolman Park, also known as Rocket Park.
- Bountiful's City Council
- The site designer, based in Arizona
- Concretedisiples.com
- A place for skaters to congregate off of the roads.
- "10 foot park style bowl and then an 8 foot pool, with pool cope and all. a good flow section and nice street."
- A skate park at the Rec Center may not be built, saving the County residents money.
- The area is secluded and may attract child predators and crime. (The park is secluded, so this argument may hold no water)
- No supervision, pointing to safety concerns.
- The Park is not centrally located, and is uphill.
- No venues are close, and buses are scarce.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste at 11/17/2006 02:22:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
4:15 PM
0
comments
Labels: Recreation Center, skaters, special interest, spending, waste
[Davis County Watch: Citizenship] Centerville wants to widen Main Street
WP, who posts at the Centerville Citizen blog, is helping to form the Main Street Property Owners Association to fight the widening of Main Street.
Main Street in Centerville.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Citizenship at 11/17/2006 08:56:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
10:26 AM
0
comments
Labels: citizenship, transportation
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Citizenship] Davis Parents sue School Board
A group of Davis Parents have sued the County School board for convening six closed door meetings surrounding a proposed boundary change. The board says the meetings were not of a 'public body', and so can be closed.
This lawsuit should clarify whether a 'special committee' is considered a 'public body', or not.
Davis Parents sue District
Update: A judge has issued a restraining order to prevent the boundary change from occurring. The court will reconvene in December.
My thoughts: The School District needs to settle out of court-take whatever hit is required, and move on. This could have, rather should have, been handled without a lawsuit.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Citizenship at 11/15/2006 02:38:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
3:52 PM
0
comments
Labels: citizenship, education, lawsuit, transparency
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Guest Bloggers] North Salt Lake is going High Tech...
I've read some controversy about the new electronic sign that is going in in the roundabout as you head up the hill. The controversy was over having something so distracting in the center of an already confusing non-intersection.
My concern is also with placement. Why in the world would the city put a sign that is supposed to announce important city-related things in an area where huge portions of the city will never see it, or even possibly be aware that it exists?
It's not something that you could see easily (or read at all) from highway 89, if you happened to be coming into the city that way. It's obvious that no location would ideal for all city residents, but placing it at the CITY BUILDING sure would have made a lot more sense.
I hate to get into "the hill people" versus "us low landers" types of arguments, but this seems a case where the city council was not thinking about all of the people they represent. I know there are good, honest people on our city council, but it is interesting that there are no city council members living below orchard drive. Seems like "us low landers" need to get a little more involved...
--
Posted by Allie to Davis County Watch: Guest Bloggers at 11/14/2006 02:17:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
3:26 PM
0
comments
Labels: guest bloggers, spending, waste
Monday, November 13, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions] Is Blogging a Perfect Fit?
I've come up with a list of circumstances which might make blogging a good outlet. You might consider becoming a blogger if you are:
A reformed, non-profit, spammer. Do you forward unsolicited email to your family, or friends, because you think it your duty to 'set them straight'? Blogging can save your friendships! All those people who thought you'd become too obnoxious, or annoying, will now love you. How could they feel otherwise, they hardly hear from you anymore. They don't read your blog, and they never read your emails.
Disenfranchised. Vote not counted? Crushed by your city manager? Don't have a voice? Is nobody listening? People who blog can, at least, pretend that they are being heard because, after all, you're on google aren't you? Are you a politician that recently lost an election? Instead of sending emails, and letters to all the people that ruined your life, start blogging. Soon that warm feeling you got when you thought everybody loved you will slowly return.
Unable to make enough time in the day. Blogging will, actually, free up more time in the day. This might be a surprise, until you realize that blogging will save you from having to send that letter to the editor. It will help you to organize your thoughts. In fact, blogging is such a noble enterprise, that you'll feel totally justified saying, "I know I should have patched that hole in my roof, but I was blogging."
Far too important to be blogging. You are, in fact, the perfect candidate to become a blogger, because you have already mastered the thing to which all bloggers aspire--The huge ego. Rant, rave, blast the, so called, establishment. Bring everybody down a notch. Arbitrarily delete comments. Belittle, berate, and people will recognize you for what you are. Best of all, you get to keep your superiority complex.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions at 11/13/2006 09:29:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
11:53 AM
0
comments
Labels: blog, citizenship, creative solutions, media
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Announcements] Blogging without a name (Not even a fake one)
A new, anonymous, blogger has started writing about South Davis County. Here is what I can surmise about them.
- They've, likely, tried blogging before.
- They probably live in Bountiful now.
- They grew up in Bountiful, attended Bountiful High School, and were taught by, one, Kim Burningham.
Little, old, me.
Mr. S.D. Guy's website
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Announcements at 11/07/2006 03:39:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
5:06 PM
0
comments
Labels: announcements, blog, media
Monday, November 06, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Elections]Christening the New Government
Whatever happens on Tuesday, we can be sure that a sizable chunk of the populace will be disappointed in the results. Just as we are certain that, many will be indifferent, although they weighed in for one candidate, or one ballot initiative-perhaps, without thinking, in the booth.
For those of us who care about whom is elected, let me offer this one positive outlook. No matter which individual takes office in January. No matter which party marks the win, or which special interest group, our government is never divorced from our influence. It isn't some Cruise ship that comes ashore, only, every two years for a visit. We are in this government. It is a part of us, not we of it.
Think of what could have happened, in recent years, if certain elected officials got their way.
- 138% tax increase
- NSL becomes Orchard Hills
- No "Legacy Highway"
- Constitutional Flag burning amendment
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
2:16 PM
0
comments
Labels: citizenship, elections
[Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions] Another Check and Balance for Diebold
I Just had a thought regarding the accuracy of the vote on Tuesday. Much has been said about whether the vote could actually be hacked, and I want to pile onto that discussion.
What happens if, I, the voter become momentarily, insane, or ill, while voting? Consider the following scenario, and tell me where I'm wrong. What if, in the midst of voting for my candidate I have a stroke, and my left arm goes limp? Since I'm right-handed, I might never know that I just stroked out! Is my vote still good? Now I've, recently, learned that a good way to tell if you are having a stroke is to raise both arms high above the head, speak a sentence out loud, and smile. If you can do those three things, then you're not having a stroke.
This brings us to my proposal for stroke free vote. Let's redesign the voting machines to require the voter to raise both arms, and turn two keys simultaneously, while smiling, and saying the words, "My voice is my password". This should, forever, cure the world of stroke-based voting errors.
Now if we could only come up with a way to check for insanity-based voting.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions at 11/06/2006 12:56:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
2:11 PM
0
comments
Labels: creative solutions
Thursday, November 02, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Guest Bloggers] Can't decide who to support for State School Board?
Well, you're not alone. Chris Barden's campaign director wasn't sure, even after he'd taken the job with the Barden campaign.
Ben Horsely (who, incidentally, is a staffer for Rob Bishop) received a payment of $1,400 from Barden on September 22nd for his campaign director duties. On September 28th, he came to a meet the candidate event I had organized for Kim. I asked him if he supported Kim. He said he wasn't sure - that he'd just come to get some information to help him decide which candidate to support. I hope he's figured it out. Kim Burningham is the best choice for Utah's schools.
--
Posted by NatGo to Davis County Watch: Guest Bloggers at 11/02/2006 08:35:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
9:46 AM
0
comments
Labels: guest bloggers
Monday, October 30, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Announcements] The Blog that wouldn't post
I've discovered a defect in my little hack to post topically on DCW (that's short for Davis County Watch). If I save a draft of my post, or the blog automatically saves a draft, then it doesn't get put up on the parent blog. So, I'm ditching this scheme, and I'm going to try the Blogger Beta. Give me a week or so to work up the guts to take the plunge, and we'll be back, and better than ever.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Announcements at 10/30/2006 10:11:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
1:44 PM
0
comments
Labels: announcements
[Davis County Watch: Election] Question the Candidates
I have been asked to post the following Q&A's on several of our County and State Candidates. The submitter asked that I keep them anonymous, and I'll respect that. For those of you, my readers, that have an insight into whom this might be, please keep it to yourselves.
I've modified the format, slightly, for stylistic purposes.
Candidates, feel free to offer corrections, and additions in the comments. If I were subject to the same rules as the MSM, I would, probably, not post the comments from candidates that came unanswered by the opposition, but I am not subject to those rules. Therefore, one Commission Candidate(Miller) gets a free ride. I invite his opponent(Millburn) to respond, as is his right. Anyway, I've covered a lot on Millburn, and Miller on this blog, so I don't feel terrible about this post. As it stands, this late in the game, it's a little unfair to expect an immediate response from anyone, if we also expect the candidates to be hitting the pavement, and knocking on doors. A week before the election, all good candidates should be very hard to reach, open-door policies notwithstanding.
Submitted by: Anonymous
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: QuestionsTaxes
1. There will be quite a bit of pressure from many groups regarding projects/programs which would require tax monies. How, as commissioner, would you do to determine when to place a proposition on the ballot vs. when to tell the group to go out to the community to either collect the funds necessary themselves or gather the requisite signatures to place the initiative on the ballot themselves? Feelings on a RAP tax?
2. What do you consider/define “core functions of government”?
3. When should tax increases be considered? What criteria would you use to cut spending/programs? Are there any you would cut now?
4. How would you address the senior center/flood control issues?
Identity Theft (this also, somewhat, ties into illegal immigration)
5. Would you support requiring the county to verify (using free Federal Programs) the SSN of new hires as well as requiring those to whom the county contracts to?STATE HOUSE: QuestionsTaxes
1. What would you propose to do with a tax surplus?
2. What do you consider/define “core functions of government”?
Immigration
3. What do you propose to do regarding granting of in-state tuition for illegal immigrants?
4. What do you propose to do regarding granting of driver privilege cards?
ID Theft
5. Would you support requiring the State/Businesses to verify the SSN of those they hire (using free Federal programs)?
Schools
6. What are your attitudes regarding the funding of public education and tuition tax credits/vouchers?
Gas Prices
7. Do you feel price gouging is occurring? Why/Why not?
Guns
8. What are you feelings regarding concealed weapons permit issues (in schools etc etc)COUNTY COMMISSIONERSBret Millburn (Seat A – Republican)
***Unable to reach. Bad luck on my part (whenever I called, no one was home!)?***
Rob Miller (Seat A – Democrat)
Q1. There will be quite a bit of pressure from many groups regarding projects/programs which would require tax monies. How, as commissioner, would you do to determine when to place a proposition on the ballot vs. when to tell the group to go out to the community to either collect the funds necessary themselves or gather the requisite signatures to place the initiative on the ballot themselves? Feelings on a RAP tax?
A1. There is an established procedure for ballot issues. Not sure of details but current commission follows it. However, if it is an issue with strong support it is worth studying. RAP tax isn't necessary but is a quality of life issue and would support placing it on the ballot. Emphasized that he doesn't want to raise taxes but taxes are needed for certain issues. Doesn't believe taxes are the answer to everything. Noted that he went into a business that was losing $40K/month – he cut the waste and turned it into a profitable operation. Would bring that same mentality to the commission. Trim fat first before looking at taxes.
Q2. What do you consider/define “core functions of government”?
A2. Flood control, infrastructure, roads, Dept of Health, corridor preservation. Shouldn't legislate morality nor be anti-business. Some social services are appropriate: meth is a growing problem and treatment would be cheaper and more effective than simply housing a prisoner (noted SL Co. found it cost $10/day? in a recovery program rather than $80/day? in prison. Obviously not all meth users etc would qualify for recovery – certain criteria would have to be met.
Q3. When should tax increases be considered? What criteria would you use to cut spending/programs? Are there any you would cut now?
A3. Doesn't believe in protecting people from themselves – RAP is Ok if people are happy with it and willing to pay. Go back East to see how high property taxes can be. Pledged that he would NOT vote for new property taxes during his 4 year term.
Q4. How would you address the senior center/flood control issues?
A4. ***My bad – I forgot to ask him about the flood control/senior issues – Sorry!!!***
Q5. Would you support requiring the county to verify (using free Federal Programs) the SSN of new hires as well as requiring those to whom the county contracts to?
A5. Fully supports requiring county and contractor SSN verification.
Louenda Downs (Seat B – Republican)
Q1. There will be quite a bit of pressure from many groups regarding projects/programs which would require tax monies. How, as commissioner, would you do to determine when to place a proposition on the ballot vs. when to tell the group to go out to the community to either collect the funds necessary themselves or gather the requisite signatures to place the initiative on the ballot themselves? Feelings on a RAP tax?
A1. [Specifically addressed RAP tax as an example]. First ask, do citizens want it and is great interest expressed – if so support placing on ballot, but would understand that commission must be willing to 'take heat' for doing so. Wouldn't support placing every request on a ballot. Also, proposals must demonstrate that they wouldn't over-burden taxpayers.
Q2. What do you consider/define “core functions of government”?
A2. State/Fed constitutions define to a point. Essentially represent the people and provide services necessary spelled out by policy/statute. Stated RAP wouldn't fit her definition but depends on how it is pursued (some could argue it relates to tourism), nevertheless after defining 'core functions', she may have to reconsider RAP and it must be more clearly defined as to how it would meet these criteria.
Q3. When should tax increases be considered? What criteria would you use to cut spending/programs? Are there any you would cut now?
A3. Taxes should be a last resort. There are many ways to take care of services rather than immediately turning to taxes. Every option should be explored first. Commissioners must remember they represent the people including their pocketbooks. Taxes are crushing to many. Better planning is needed as the commission appeared to avoid addressing cost increases leading to the large tax increase proposal. People should initially be brought together to find an alternative solution to taxation. Worthy to look at cutting programs and fat in programs, although this can be limited by statutory requirements (eg. mandated funding levels etc).
Q4. How would you address the senior center/flood control issues?
A4. Bring a group together that understands the problem and is tied to the community. Initially look for sources of alternative funding. Wonders why plan for flood control infrastructure wasn't addressed until now. Believes grants could help as well as pursuing other funding options other than taxes.
Q5. Would you support requiring the county to verify (using free Federal Programs) the SSN of new hires as well as requiring those to whom the county contracts to?
A5. Feels inclined to support, but hasn't heard enough about the programs etc and would like to garner more information prior to taking a strong stance on SSN verification.
Chris Martinez (Seat B – Democrat)
Q1. There will be quite a bit of pressure from many groups regarding projects/programs which would require tax monies. How, as commissioner, would you do to determine when to place a proposition on the ballot vs. when to tell the group to go out to the community to either collect the funds necessary themselves or gather the requisite signatures to place the initiative on the ballot themselves? Feelings on a RAP tax?
A1. Initiate a complete study of the project/program. Meet with citizens for their opinion remembering it is your money we're dealing with. Felt it is fine for the commission to place a RAP tax on the ballot.
Q2. What do you consider/define “core functions of government”?
A2. Wouldn't include 'nice to haves'. Conference Center likely shouldn't be considered a core function but we're not really paying for it. Senior's don't need a 'nice to have building' but should have something they can freely move around in. A RAP tax would be ok assuming the moneys were used for their defined purpose and not siphoned off to other areas of government – then again, RAP would be mostly city administered rather than county.
Q3. When should tax increases be considered? What criteria would you use to cut spending/programs? Are there any you would cut now?
A3. Study the project first and invite citizens to comment upon it. Should cut spending by first conducting a wage study as the Commissioner's salaries appear very high. Cut COLAs for the commissioners. Conduct a wage study for the entire county. Include a study on current spending – doesn't feel that we have full fiscal accountability in all county depts (ie waste). We should have a surplus, but don't.
Q4. How would you address the senior center/flood control issues?
A4. Supports senior center and flood controls but believes that available state/fed/other grants could fund the projects. Wonders why the county hadn't planned for the eventual maintenance/repairs of the flood controls.
Q5. Would you support requiring the county to verify (using free Federal Programs) the SSN of new hires as well as requiring those to whom the county contracts to?
A5. Issue is mostly federal but runs to lowest level. Wouldn't allow false SSNs to be used – favors the proposal to verify SSNs prior to employment etc.STATE HOUSEBeth Holbrook (Democrat)
Q1. What would you propose to do with a tax surplus?
A1. Should look at better funding for education. Doesn't believe their needs are adequately funded. Should also look at funding for transportation to give people as many options as possible. Also consider a 'rainy day fund'.
Q2. What do you consider/define “core functions of government”?
A2. Basic functions such as police functions etc. Obviously we shouldn't throw money at everything. Some gray areas such as the $2 mil Emergency Medicaid Fund shortfall that was covered by private individuals last session may be in government's interest. RAP/Open space could also be a gray area depending on circumstances – need to look at it in a long term perspective, if we only have 50 acres left, do we allow them to be developed or maintain them as an open space?
Q3. What do you propose to do regarding granting of in-state tuition for illegal immigrants?
A3. Attended UofU President's event. Only 27 students are using the benefit and working to citizenship. So far there is no comprehensive national solution. At least we could create citizens who are a value to society.
Q4. What do you propose to do regarding granting of driver privilege cards?
A4. Shouldn't issue the licenses. People from other states are coming here for them. Fraud seems to be rampant as the current system stands and it needs to be fixed.
Q5. Would you support requiring the State/Businesses to verify the SSN of those they hire (using free Federal programs)?
A5. ID theft/fraud is rampant. There is easy availability via computer programs/thefts etc. Hasn't heard much about the SSN verification systems and would have to look into it further. Grey area of government intervention. Employers should be allowed to run businesses as they wish but they do have repercussions and affect others by their practices. SSN verification is something that should be studied.
Q6. What are your attitudes regarding the funding of public education and tuition tax credits/vouchers?
A6. Touchy subject. Many feel their children aren't getting the education they should and want control. However, public ed. Is funded by society as a whole and allow government scrutiny (sometimes too much). Concerned private wouldn't have the same scrutiny as public ed schools thereby not allowing a good comparison. Theoretically, we could pay for Johnny to learn to paint a fence (NOTE: she, strongly, specified that she doesn't believe that actually occurs). Worth looking at certain aspects of education, but taking $2200 out no wouldn't be helpful.
Q7. Do you feel price gouging is occurring? Why/Why not?
A7. Believes some sort of investigation is in order. Large corps making huge profits may need more scrutiny to avoid any more ENRON-type issues. Ultimately, a gray area where government intervention could be overbearing, but oil is a limited market dealing with a commodity everyone depends on (affects every part of our lives). If investigation reveals prices are simple supply and demand, then let the subject go.
Q8. What are you feelings regarding concealed weapons permit issues (in schools etc etc)
A8. Supports with the current guidelines in place. Doesn't feel well informed about the issue. Possibly schools could ban them. [Asked for more info. - specifically if there are any legal/vigilante issues with concealed permit holders and if I, as a parent would be comfortable with a teacher having a firearm. I noted that permit holders have much lower crime rates than the general population and have regular background checks run on them by the regulating agency. Personally know several permit holders and you would never know it unless they told you. Also noted that I do have a child in school and that I would feel much more comfortable if they had something to defend my child with should a lock down occur and an assailant attempt to harm anyone in their class]. She noted that my comments eased her concern and that my armed teacher point did make sense. Additionally noted that an armed teacher may also aid in avoiding any confrontation whatsoever as most criminals etc prefer to be unopposed (ie initially keeping them away or resulting in their withdrawal from the venue prior to any conflict.
Robert Moultrie (Constitution)
Q1. What would you propose to do with a tax surplus?
A1. Return the surplus to the tax payers.
Q2. What do you consider/define “core functions of government”?
A2. Core functions mean bare bones – public safety, protection of freedom of expression, religion. Laws framed to protect and maintain property rights etc. If it's not in the UT constitution it is not necessary. Programs would have to be looked at in a case-by-case basis.
Q3. What do you propose to do regarding granting of in-state tuition for illegal immigrants?
A3. End the in-state tuition program for illegal immigrants.
Q4. What do you propose to do regarding granting of driver privilege cards?
A4. End the driver privilege card program.
Q5. Would you support requiring the State/Businesses to verify the SSN of those they hire (using free Federal programs)?
A5. Fully supports SSN verification
Q6. What are your attitudes regarding the funding of public education and tuition tax credits/vouchers?
A6. Initially, vouchers may be good (short term). However, is concerned that private schools could become dependent upon them and, over the long term, the government would begin to attach strings to the vouchers thereby creating a new class of public schools under government control. Would prefer ending public education system altogether, but that is unlikely to occur.
Q7. Do you feel price gouging is occurring? Why/Why not?
A7. Support the free market but thinks it worthy of an investigation. If investigation indicates it is free market at work, then so be it. Believes that consumers have responsibility in where they purchase fuel from however also feels that long established oil companies may be suppressing competition (and full free market effects). Cited example that many of these oil companies are the largest/chief funding sources of environmental groups. The environmental groups lobby/sue etc to create stricter controls and more red tape for startup oil companies making it virtually impossible to build new refineries etc resulting in a hindrance to free market forces. [note: he never cast the impression that this was some kind of 'conspiracy' and should not be taken as such. Essentially, he was stating a potential tactic used by the established oil companies to suppress startups from entering the market].
Q8. What are you feelings regarding concealed weapons permit issues (in schools etc etc)
A8. Fully supports permit holder's rights to carry. Fully supports the 2nd Amendment.
Paul Neuenschwander (Republican)
Q1. What would you propose to do with a tax surplus?
A1. There is a spending limit of $80 million with the exception of Education and Transportation. It would require the legislature to raise the cap or exempt other areas of the cap. With surpluses, we should consider all opportunities first. It might be wise to look at a 0.25% tax increase for transportation corridors. Favors returning as much as possible to taxpayers – taking into consideration what government can do with it.
Q2. What do you consider/define “core functions of government”?
A2. Public safety, public education, constitutionally defined items, assistance with drug/alcohol abuse – would like to see more programs as he believes they assist in public safety. [Asked if RAP/open space tax proposals would fall in as a core function]. Is it government responsibility? No. But he has supported both and will continue to do so – will also consider how they might affect his district.
Q3. What do you propose to do regarding granting of in-state tuition for illegal immigrants?
A3. Feels opposed to in-state tuition but under a hundred people are using it right now (attended a UofU President's event on the matter). UofU event argued that we put them through high school – do we continue to improve their way of life?
Q4. What do you propose to do regarding granting of driver privilege cards?
A4. Opposed driver privilege cards – it entices them and others to the state.
Q5. Would you support requiring the State/Businesses to verify the SSN of those they hire (using free Federal programs)?
A5. May be hard for small business – why place burden on them [I noted the programs were free and returned results in short time frames – oftentimes minutes, depending on the program]. Understands how it could help but what do we do if they don't verify? Fine them? Businesses shouldn't have to do it but supports the idea/goal.
Q6. What are your attitudes regarding the funding of public education and tuition tax credits/vouchers?
A6. Hasn't accepted money form the UEA or tax credit/voucher folks. Education has been given a $245 mil. Increase last year and 300% increase over the last 10 years. What should we expect for that money? Not willing to commit to either side until he can study issue/proposals and get further answers to questions.
Q7. Do you feel price gouging is occurring? Why/Why not?
A7. Believes the free market system is at work. Noted that there is some recent interest in opening a refinery in Vernal. Government shouldn't come along and ask businesses regarding their costs and products as may open up their trade secrets.
Q8. What are you feelings regarding concealed weapons permit issues (in schools etc etc)
A8. Supports the 2nd Amendment, but believes some restrictions are appropriate – such as a ban firearms (including concealed weapons permit holders) in schools and churches.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Election at 10/30/2006 08:33:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
12:56 PM
0
comments
A Letter to the Editor...
Posted by: Allie
Editor:
A recent news story about Rob Miller, a Democratic candidate for the Davis County Commission mentioned my endorsement of his candidacy. Since then, our County Clerk, Mr. Steve Rawlings, has asserted to various and sundry folks, based on that endorsement, that I am not really a Republican. I’m not aware that the County Clerk determines who is or isn’t a Republican, but I believe his concern about that story to be symptomatic of a larger and more serious problem which afflicts Davis County government.
It was not so long ago that our County Commission proposed an unnecessary 138 percent property tax increase, for which the head cheerleader was (and still is) – Steve Rawlings, the County Clerk. I lent my name to Rob Miller’s campaign, because that proposed 138 percent property tax increase was the product of three things: arrogance, hubris, and too many years of one-party government. That tax increase was reduced, but I note a 45 percent county tax increase announced for this year.
Most Utahns – and most Davis County voters – vote a split ticket now and then. I was a Republican legislator in the 1970s, which was a different political age. It was an age of bi-partisanship and cross-party political cordiality, and I think Utah was better-served by that mutual respect than it has been by the hard-edged, personalized, one-party variety of politics that has come to replace it. One of the Cal Rampton Democrats, whose political cordiality I valued, was Michael Miller – Rob Miller’s father. By a twist of family destiny, Rob’s grandparents were two memorably prominent Republicans – Vernon and Helen Romney.
The Republican Party for which I was the Davis County Chairman (in the Jurassic Age) stood for limited government, balanced budgets, and efficiency. That Republican Party would have been mortified at a single year’s 138 property tax increase. It would have been embarrassed at the disparity between the growth rate of commissioners’ salaries (now at $96,000 and a $7,000 vehicle allowance) and the disappearance rate of unincorporated area within the County to virtually zero.
Perhaps adding one Democrat to the County Commission would make it easier for city mayors to reach some meaningful agreements with the County Commission on elimination of duplicative services. It might invite a new assessment of the way necessary county services are provided, and it might even make the commission more concerned about whether all sides of an issue have been sufficiently worked through to assure a balanced and sensible policy decision. Certainly, the sky would not fall, and we might just get better government.
Neither political party has a monopoly on either virtue, vice, or wise policies. Decades of single-party domination tend to produce stagnation and hubris. And 138 percent tax increases.
David R. Irvine
Bountiful
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
11:32 AM
1 comments
Labels: guest bloggers, legislature, taxes
Monday, October 23, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Guest Bloggers] Kim Burningham
Posted by Natalie
As you may know, I am very passionate about public education. I believe that our democracy is strengthened when we have an educated populace. And, so, I advocate for a quality public education for every child.
On my education policy blog, Education in Utah, I am endorsing Kim Burningham for the State School Board in district 5 (South Davis County). I have received an email from Mr Burningham answering many of the concerns that are raised by Christopher Barden on the website Tyler has linked. I have posted it on the blog. Feel free to check it out.
Thanks!
--
Posted by NatGo to Davis County Watch: Guest Bloggers at 10/23/2006 09:28:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
10:34 PM
0
comments
Labels: elections, guest bloggers
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Election] Vote R. Christopher Barden
I met Dr. Barden's wife the other day and was impressed enough, that I've decided to endorse Dr. Barden for the State Board of Education.
His credentials are impeccable. He's often introduced, when he speaks as the "only licensed psychologist and licensed attorney in America to receive two national research awards in psychology and a law degree with honors from Harvard Law School." He took it upon himself to single-handedly debunk the junk science of 'repressed memories'. As a psychologist, and an attorney, he was able to successfully present cases across the country, simultaneously.
Now, he wants to serve on the State Board of Education without monetary compensation (that means without pay). I support him for the following reasons.
- Pay for Performance: He wants teachers pay to be merit based. I, Tyler, work in the private sector, and my pay is, in part, dependant upon my performance. Teachers will excel where they are given the proper motivation to succeed.
- Reward Successful Schools: He will apply performance based rewards across the spectrum. (to faculty, administrators, schools, districts).
- Transparency: He will apply the principle of transparency to tax-dollars spent for education.
- Recruitment: He is suggesting a scholarship program that will incentivize the best university students to teach in Public Schools.
Dr. R. Chris Barden
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Election at 10/18/2006 09:31:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
11:00 AM
0
comments
Friday, October 13, 2006
An Online Poll:Do you steal lawn signs?
I thought I'd try my hand at an online poll. I know, those who know me are going to think this is ironic. I mean, I'm the guy that hacked the Clipper poll. Well, just so you know, you're free to hack this one if you want. I won't be offended. And, we aren't going to put this in any of the 'Standard Works' of the County.
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
1:32 PM
0
comments
[Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste] NSL Name Change: Not gonna happen
The city council has decided to not go ahead with a name change. So, we're seeing a return to sanity.
The Clipper article, also, has a bunch of useless factoids, and conclusions, about the amount of education that NSL residents have received.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste at 10/13/2006 08:18:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
9:22 AM
0
comments
Thursday, October 12, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste] Senate Finance implicates Five Non-profits
I don't usually focus on national issues, but since I've both referenced some of the Non-Profit groups in this report, and link to one of them(Citizens Against Government Waste), I thought I should, at least, make mention of them.
The Washington Post reported earlier today, that the Senate Finance Commitee, of which Orrin Hatch is a member, has come out with a report implicating five Non-Profit organizations as being on the payroll of lobbyist, turned jail-bird, Jack Abramoff.
The report is over 600 pages long, so I'll only give my first impressions.
- Chuck Grassley, who Chairs the Finance Commitee, was featured as CAGW's Porker of the Month in May, 2005. Does he have an axe to grind?
- CAGW seems to have been implicate via circumstantial evidence alone. There appears to be no record of direct communication with Abramoff to indicate that they were 'bribed'. Note: CAGW was founded in response to a request by Ronald Reagan.
- Grover Norquist, a common target, seems to have been caught seeking donations for one or more of his organizations.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste at 10/12/2006 04:02:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
5:21 PM
0
comments
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Election] Blogging Politics: An act of will
To those who have noticed the chasm between posts on this blog I apologize! I've been a little sick of politics this election cycle. To go easy on myself I have been looking for non-partisan politics in which to delve. I have to say that the least partisan of issues, this time around the track, 'appears' to be education. For example, it appears that nobody really wants the tax-cut we got, just the one we didn't, which is what happens when our personal prosperity is pitted against the prosperity of the children. In particular, non-partisanship is found in the list of candidates for the Davis School Board. A view from outer space shows us a list of candidates that are, entirely, 'Non-Partisan'. However, a closer inspection of any one of these candidates should show some bias. So, it should be clear that because a person is non-partisan, it does not always follow that they are objective. In fact, looking beyond Party, we should notice a growing list of groups, known as the PAC, or Political Action Commitee. These are groups that lobby, not one party alone, but throw their money across all political divides. They promote one candidate over another, just as Parties do. A PAC can be Non-Partisan, yet can also be so destructive. Ah, so my illness, of late, has not been the result of too much partisanship. Perhaps it has been too much divisiveness?
Divisive can be defined as the attribute of one who cuts through the crap so as to add more to the pile. This time around the track, I have seen the crap-pile grow exponentially. I would like to create a list of divisive activities that I've encountered, yet I don't want to add fuel to the fire. If I were to, say, accuse another of such an act then, I too, may be found guilty of it.
So, cut the crap--or don't.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Election at 10/10/2006 03:37:00 PM
Sunday, October 01, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Announcements] October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month
You may have noticed the blog is pink again. This time for Breast Cancer Awareness Month. For more information, go to Pink for October.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Announcements at 10/01/2006 06:19:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
7:21 PM
0
comments
Labels: announcements
Friday, September 29, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions] Standard Examiner:Transportation::Davis leaders to send letter with concerns
For the last week, my drive home has taken about three times as long. I drive north along I-215, and the bottleneck has begun in SL, around 7th North, but the pimple on my route seems to be where I-15 and 215 merge.
If Davis County were a room of your home, it would be the bedroom hallway, and the fact remains that the great majority of our residents still work outside of the County. So, I'm pleased to see that the Council of Governments is requesting of SL that they consider Davis County when they plan the downtown. I'm also hopeful that we will take responsibility for the bottleneck that we create in our own vicinity.
Transportation::Davis leaders to send letter with concerns
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions at 9/29/2006 08:42:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
9:51 AM
0
comments
Thursday, September 28, 2006
NSL Dodges bullet from SL County
I should really create a category for things like this running problem with Salt Lake. I hate that wedge issues arise that seem to be motivated for reasons of spite. Why does Rocky want alienate SL and NSL. Why does the City Council Support him if not for political correctness alone? Why SL County? As NSL attorney, Brent Hatch, has said, "“I don’t know why they [SL County] would want to get involved in the litigation.”
Well, it appears that any decision that SL County may have made, pre-emptively, on the contested 80 acres as 'open space' is tabled, for now.
NSL Dodges bullet from SL County
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
2:19 PM
0
comments
Labels: land
Monday, September 25, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Announcements] Blogger BETA already does Categories
After doing all the work to come up with my snazzy Blog-by-topic workaround, I've discovered that Blogger BETA let's you do virtually the same thing. They call it 'Labels'. See this example from a blog of a friend of mine. I haven't decided to take the plunge, yet, since I have already done the work. However, anyone is welcome to take advantage of the work that Blogger has done to give us this feature.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Announcements at 9/25/2006 11:39:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
1:18 PM
0
comments
Labels: announcements
Saturday, September 23, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Announcements] The Breakfast Exchange Club of South Davis County: Meet the Candidate
The Breakfast Exchange Club of South Davis County is a member of the National Exchange Club and the Rocky Mountain District Exchange Clubs. It meets at the Cotton Tree Motel in North Salt Lake (Kmart Exit) on Thursdays at 7:30AM. A speaker is featured each week at these meetings and the public is invited, free of charge. Breakfast may be obtained from the Diner, if desired, for a nominal fee.
Thursday, September 28th, 7:30 AM
Cotton Tree Motel in North Salt Lake (Kmart Exit)
Speakers will be:
Bret Millburn, Candidate for Davis County Commision (Seat A)
Louenda Downs, Candidate for Davis County Commision (Seat B)
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Announcements at 9/23/2006 08:28:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
9:42 PM
0
comments
Labels: announcements
[Davis County Watch: Citizenship] The Clipper is an 'inspired' work?
I realize that my previous post is quite heavy in content. So, I wanted to post something more succinct from the same event that may tickle your interest in reading, or listening, further.
If you fast forward the audio linked to in my previous post to 2:06:55, you'll get to hear Tom Hardy, Bountiful's City Manager, elevate the Davis County Clipper to the status of a 'Standard Work', along with the Bible, Book of Mormon, et. al.
Hardy said, "We do not include the Ogden Standard as part of the inspired works".
Well, I wonder what the Standard Examiner readership might say to that?
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Citizenship at 9/23/2006 01:11:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
2:19 AM
0
comments
[Davis County Watch: Citizenship] Ann Hardy questions Citizens for Tax Fairness
Political Subdivisions Interim Committee--September 20th, 2006
I'll post a section of the discussion from a meeting at a State Legislature Committee meeting. The entire audio can be heard here.
The topic of discussion was "Using Public Funds to Promote Political Issues", specifically, centered on the Rec Center fiasco of a couple of years ago.
It begins 1:39:20 into the discussion with a question posed to Ronald Mortensen who was testifying in front of the committee.
Ann Hardy:
I would like to ask you how you think it's fair to taxpayers, for the last two years, for you to have taken up the time of taxpayer paid, elected officials-both County Commissioners, the County Clerk, five Mayors, City Council Members, the Attorney General, and now bring it to the Legislature. If you added that up I would guess it's probably thousands of dollars of taxpayer money that's been involved in this and I want to know how you feel that that's being fair to taxpayers?
Ronald Mortensen:
I think it's fair for a citizen to exercise their right to participate in the system. I don't think that we're...if we're doing that than nobody should become involved. Or, if we're going to put a dollar value on every time we talk to somebody, or, ask a Legislator to do something. And, I think that the system is enhanced if there is a challenge. We do challenge things! We question, why is this tax going to this? Why is this tax rate like this? Why are we building this? Why should we be doing this? And, there's different, divergent, points of view on it. It's not a uniform, or a monolithic
government where government is all-knowing and government is all-right. If you don't have public discourse in the process then you are going to have abuse of the system, you are going to have corruption come into the system. And you have...There are different groups out there that have voices. And, all we're doing is we're giving a certain voice to a certain area of concern, and I hope that we're not saying that we are going to be denied the opportunity to do that because it inopportunes public officials?
Ann Hardy: Could I make a comment?
Walker: You bet!
Ann Hardy: That wasn't really my point. My point was obviously you have that right, and any citizen has that right, but at some point you have to recognize the fact, especially after the Attorney General has ruled in the manner that he did, or one of his staff, that maybe you need to move on to another issue.
Ronald Mortensen: Well, I think you could say that. I think, though, if you look at the way the Attorney General--if you go to court and you get a...and there is a decision made in a court. You have the right to appeal that decision if you think that a mistake was made on an issue of law or, on an issue of the facts. And, that's all we're doing in this situation it's not--We just asked the Attorney General to take another look at it. Did you overlook something? And uh...and that's all we asked on this issue on it. So, I don't see that there's anything wrong with doing that. And like I say, I've been gone for two months, so I'm not badgering people every day when I'm sitting in Beirut. I'm not uh, not uh, as I guess I've been portrayed as badgering public officials.
I could have gone on beyond this, but I think this, alone, speaks volumes.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Citizenship at 9/23/2006 12:16:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
2:10 AM
0
comments
Labels: legislature, Recreation Center
Friday, September 22, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions] Davis County Library: Downloadable ebooks/audiobooks for patrons
It's been years since I've used my library card, but I might have to go dig it up. Davis County Library Patrons can now download ebooks and audio books online.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Creative Solutions at 9/22/2006 02:26:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
3:29 PM
0
comments
[Davis County Watch: Announcements] Preserving Davis County: Proposed Property Tax increase
Open houses for the public, regarding the proposed tax increase, will be held on October 25th at the Centerville Library (5:00-8:45 p.m.), and on October 26th at the Layton Library (5:00-9:00 p.m.). For details, click here.
Questions or comments regarding the proposed tax increase can be emailed to 2007budget@daviscountyutah.gov
Focus:
Flood Control
Operating the New Jail
Our Senior Citizens
Source: Davis County Website
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Announcements at 9/22/2006 02:17:00 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
3:20 PM
0
comments
Labels: announcements, taxes
Thursday, September 21, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Guest Bloggers] Meet the Candidate: Kim Burningham

Kim Burningham is south Davis County's current representative on the State School Board, where he also serves as chair. I am hosting a meet the candidate/walk your neighborhood night for Kim on Thursday, September 28th at 6:00. We'll meet at my friend Jamie's house, chat with Kim about his vision for our schools, and then divide and conquer North Salt Lake. What a great way to get involved and support a candidate who so ably supports public education! Please let me know if you are interested in attending and I'll send you more information. Thanks!
--
Posted by NatGo to Davis County Watch: Guest Bloggers at 9/21/2006 10:30:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
11:39 AM
0
comments
Labels: guest bloggers
[Davis County Watch: Election] Utah Amicus Press Conference
I found this nugget in Rob Miller's speech.
"It is a pledge that this Democrat will make and will keep. If there is an emergency that requires a tax hike, there are two other commissioners that will have to do it. Maybe even with my public support, but never my vote."(italics are mine)
At the risk of sounding pedantic, I want to reiterate what Miller is saying. He's saying the the line that he is walking may be to encourage the other Commisioners to vote for a tax, while washing his hands of the blame that comes with a vote. That is a very comfortable stand to take. It isn't taking a risk at all, and is an easy promise to keep.
It just doesn't show the spine that I know Miller has.
I want someone in office that will use their principles, not just declare their principles.
My vote is still for Bret Millburn.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Election at 9/21/2006 10:20:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
11:34 AM
0
comments
Tuesday, September 19, 2006
[Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste] Hold on! Rec Center taxes lower than thought
The title of this article represents media spin at it's finest. The implication is that we will pay less taxes than advertised. Not so! $43.00 is still higher than the $41.00 estimated in the pamphlet. Who is to say that the amount isn't lower, at least in part, due to the efforts of watchdogs like Citizens for Tax Fairness.org?
Hold on! Rec Center taxes lower than thought
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Spending and Waste at 9/19/2006 09:33:39 PM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
11:02 PM
0
comments
Labels: Recreation Center, taxes
[Davis County Watch: Elections]Juan C. Arce-Larreta for Mayor of North Salt Lake
A While ago, I said that Arce-Larreta's website wouldn't exist after the Election for NSL Mayor was over. I stand corrected.
Juan C. Arce-Larreta for Mayor of North Salt Lake
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
2:21 PM
0
comments
Labels: elections
[Davis County Watch: Announcements] Blog Organized by Topic
If you will look down the sidebar for Davis County Watch, you will now see seven links under the heading 'Davis County Topics'. I've always wished that Blogger had a feature to allow a person to blog by topic. What I didn't realize is that Blogger does allow categories. It just requires some tweaking. Here is what you'll need if you want to blog by topic with Blogger.
Ingredients:
- At least two blogs with Blogger (One Master Blog and one on a specific topic).
- A gmail (email) account.
Steps to a Topical blog with Blogger:
- I setup my gmail account to filter based on an alias. Let's say that your email address is jane.doe@gmail.com. Any email sent to jane.doe+blogthis@gmail will make it into your inbox. You then setup gmail to forward all emails sent to jane.doe+blogthis@gmail to your Mail-to-Blogger Address (i.e. jane.blog.blogger.com)
- Next I go to my master blog. In my case it is Davis County Watch, and I click on the Settings-->email tab. I fill out my Mail-to-Blogger Address (i.e. jane.blog.blogger.com) and I check publish (now anything emailed to this address will automatically be published to my Master Blog.
- If I haven't done it already I go to blogger and create one or more entirely new blogs. I called some of mine Davis County Watch: Announcements (http://daviscountywatch-announcements.blogspot.com)
- I click on Settings-->email tab for one of my topical blogs. I fill out the BlogSend Address with my alias jane.doe+blogthis@gmail. I do this same thing for each of my topical blogs.
So, what does this mean for you? It means that you can now click on one of the topics in the sidebar and look at just the topics that interest you. If you aren't at all interested in what I have to say, but want to hear from one of my Guest Bloggers, then you can click on that topic. If you like RSS Feeds, then you can subscribe to only the Feed for the topic that interests you.
I haven't worked out all the kinks yet, but things are looking good. I'm sure I could have chosen some better topics. Rest assured I will be adding more. I spent a lot of time moving most of my old posts under one of the categories, and I discovered that it's hard to categorize everything perfectly. For example, I have a category called Creative Solutions that is full posts about people/politicians doing nasty things. In a sense 'creative' has become a synonym for 'nasty'. On the other hand, I've posted some legitimate, productive, solutions that others have proposed there.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Announcements at 9/19/2006 07:37:00 AM
Update: I should really have given a hat tip for this hack to Oreilly.com
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
9:32 AM
0
comments
Labels: announcements, guest bloggers
[Davis County Watch: Announcements] Categories on Davis County Watch
I will be implementing a little blogger hack that allows me to organize my posts into categories shortly. I'll give more information later.
P.S. This is why I haven't posted much lately.
--
Posted by Tyler Farrer to Davis County Watch: Announcements at 9/19/2006 12:03:00 AM
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
1:04 AM
0
comments
Labels: announcements
Saturday, September 02, 2006
A Letter to the Past: September 2, 2001
If this letter has reached you then you can be sure that I have reached the destination that we discussed previously. Having made it thus far I can tell you that your journey may not be easy, as we once thought. And, what is worse, you may have to tread it alone. I will, however, attempt to give you hints as to what awaits you.
Several days travel for you, from now, lies a place where a great battle commenced. Many people died, and many heros were proven on that ground. Though you may think it best to not journey there, I would beg of you, for all of our sakes, that you go. Who knows but that you may prove to be one of those hero's. Or, if not, we cannot say whether your words will be the last that another hears. We must not rob those, lost to us now, of such a moment. One day yours may be our cause to fight on another field. For all that may occur, it is best that you go forward. For, as has been eloquently said by another, "they purpose not their deaths when they propose their services."(Henry V, 4.1.147)1
It was not long after that some did first question the motives of those who stood to protect that ground, but it is my hope that your voice will not add to that company. If it had been an inside job, it would have to be one that was planned long before. Not months, as has been said.
Who can say how many were involved in such a dastardly plot to take so many lives. Is it thousands? We still don't know. More plans have been made to harm us by others. Which is why we continue the battle even today. May you, one day, make it here to battle with us. Not against us as is wont to happen in war.
Whatever may happen there for you, it is my hope that we will meet, again, soon. Remember the words that bore us on, through difficult times, in past battles.
- Far-called, our navies melt away;
- On dune and headland sinks the fire:
- Lo, all our pomp of yesterday
- Is one with Nineveh and Tyre!
- Judge of the Nations, spare us yet.
- Lest we forget - lest we forget!2
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
5:23 PM
0
comments
Friday, September 01, 2006
Salt Lake Tribune - Mero quotes Mero
Okay, this letter is rimshot worthy.
Props to Dennis Miller.
Salt Lake Tribune - Mero quotes Mero
Posted by
Tyler Farrer
at
12:36 AM
0
comments
